BetaEntity Annotation Prototype
← Back to diseases

Annotated abstract

4CPS-211 Real-world treatment persistence of biologic therapies in psoriasis

ejhpharm · 2026-03-18 · canonical JSON source

38 visible annotations · policy: published · automated confidence ≥ 75.00%

Document resource

Background and Importance Biologic therapies are central to the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Treatment persistence reflects long-term efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. Real-world data are essential to understand therapeutic patterns and support clinical decisions.Aim and Objectives To assess treatment persistence among biologic therapies used in moderate-to-severe psoriasis, comparing individual drugs and therapeutic classes based on their mechanism of action.Material and Methods A retrospective analysis of electronic health records was conducted, covering the period from 2015 to the first semester of 2025, including patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic therapies. Treatment duration was calculated per patient and per drug, based on the interval between the first and last recorded administration dates. Biologics were grouped by therapeutic class: Anti-TNF, Anti-IL17, Anti-IL23, and Anti-IL12/23. Statistical comparisons of treatment persistence were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The analysis was conducted to support formulary decisions and therapeutic optimisation.Results A total of 346 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologics were included in the study, of which 286 are currently undergoing treatment. Mean number of biologics per patient was 1,39 (range: 1–5). The mean treatment duration per drug was (in months): Etanercept=40,9 (N=29); Risankizumab=24,5 (N=48); Ustekinumab=22,6 (N=39); Guselkumab=21,5 (N=23); Ixekizumab=19,1 (N=35); Adalimumab=17,6 (N=246); Secukinumab=16,2 (N=13); Brodalumab=14,4 (N=24) and Tildrakizumab=12,9 (N=23). Grouped by therapeutic class, the mean treatment duration (± standard deviation) was: Anti-IL23 = 23,5 (±16,6); Anti-IL17 = 17,0 (±18,5); Anti-IL12/23 = 22,7 (±34,6); and Anti-TNF = 20,0 (±22,8).There are significant differences in treatment duration between Anti-IL23 vs Anti-IL17: p=0,0146; Risankizumab vs Ixekizumab: p=0,0482; Anti-IL12/23 vs Anti-TNF: p=0,0480; Risankizumab vs Ustekinumab: p=0,0116. No significant differences were found between Risankizumab vs Guselkumab or Ixekizumab vs Brodalumab.Conclusion and Relevance Treatment persistence varied across biologic classes and agents. Anti-IL23 therapies showed the longest and most consistent durations, while Anti-IL17 had shorter and more variable persistence. Ustekinumab showed high mean persistence with greater variability. Significant differences were found between specific drugs and classes, favouring Anti-IL23 and ustekinumab. Limitations include the unavailability of all biologics throughout the study period and the retrospective design based on dispensing data. These findings support the use of real-world evidence and pharmaceutical monitoring to guide biologic selection and optimise long-term psoriasis management.Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest