Document resource
Objective To evaluate whether individualised treatment using the Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA) is superior to default operative or non-operative strategies.Methods We conducted a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled trial. Adults with acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomised (1:1:1) to individualised CARTA, non-operative or operative treatment. In the CARTA arm, surgery was indicated if ultrasound showed<25% tendon overlap or ≥7% elongation. The primary outcome was the Heel-Rise Work Test (HRWT) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included HRWT at 6 months, and at both 6 and 12 months, the Heel-Rise Height, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), Tegner activity scale, Copenhagen Achilles tendon Length Measure, Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA) and complication recordings.Results Between May 2018 and June 2023, 970 patients were screened; 300 were randomised (male/female 76%/24%, mean age 41 (SD 1)). At 12 months, data were available for 98 CARTA (64% operated), 100 non-operative and 97 operative patients. There were no significant between-group differences in HRWT at 12 months. However, CARTA significantly reduced rerupture rates by 73% compared with non-operative treatment (3% (95% CI) (1 to 8) vs 11% (6 to 19), p=0.03), improved ATRS by 8 points (1 to 15, p=0.02) and improved ATRA by −2° (−4 to −1), p=0.01). No difference between CARTA and operative treatment was found except 36% less underwent surgery.Conclusion Individualised CARTA did not improve functional outcomes based on the HRWT at 12 months, but among secondary outcomes, it reduced rerupture rates and improved patient-reported outcomes compared with non-operative treatment and with fewer surgeries than routine operative care.Trial registration number NCT03525964.