BetaEntity Annotation Prototype
← Back to institutions

Annotated abstract

P296 Racial differences in management and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a national analysis

gutjnl · 2026-06-23 · canonical JSON source

6 visible annotations · policy: published · automated confidence ≥ 75.00%

Document resource

Background Many contemporary studies have shown there are persistent sex and racial disparities in the outcomes of acute presentations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of sex and race on the management and outcomes of patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).Methods Using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision Codes, all adults >18 admitted from 2016–2020 with a discharge diagnosis of UGIB were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample.Results In over 900,000 hospitalisations for UGIB, 69.4%, 14.1%, 9.6%, 3.6%, 0.9% and 2.4% were for admissions in white, black, hispanic, asian/pacific islander, native american and ‘other’ patients respectively. Comorbidity burden varied between racial groups (p<0.001). White patients had higher crude rates of endoscopy, and comparable rates of surgery or interventional radiology to control blood loss, in comparison to other racial groups. Adjusted analysis revealed that black and asian/pacific islander racial group patients had lower odds of in-hospital all cause mortality compared to white patients, but ‘other’ racial group patients had higher odds of mortality (p<0.001). There was no difference for hispanic or native american patients. For non-variceal bleeding, these outcomes persisted. However, for variceal bleeds, there were no significant differences in outcomes between each racial group.Conclusions There are racial disparities in the management and outcomes of admissions for UGIB. These difference depend on the ateiology of bleeding. Underlying reasons for differences in outcomes must be investigated to ensure improved outcomes across high-risk patient groups.