BetaEntity Annotation Prototype
← Back to diseases

Annotated abstract

Causal association between different types of ametropia and risk of diabetic retinopathy: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

bmjophth · 2025-08-24 · canonical JSON source

15 visible annotations · policy: published · automated confidence ≥ 75.00%

Document resource

Objective To investigate the causal link between ametropia and diabetic retinopathy, as well as to offer genetic support for the association between these two conditions.Methods This study employed a methodology involving the utilisation of genome-wide association studies data that are publicly accessible. Specifically, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that exhibit a strong association with ametropia were employed as instrumental variables, and a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was employed to examine the causal relationship between different types of ametropia and diabetic retinopathy. The main findings were derived from the utilisation of inverse variance weighted (IVW), while supplementary results were obtained through the utilisation of MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using the ‘leave-one-out’ method. Cochran’s Q statistics were also used to quantify the heterogeneity of SNPs.Results 38 SNPs were finally included. The results of the IVW analysis indicate that myopia may exert an inhibitory effect on the development of diabetic retinopathy (OR=0.596, 95% CI (0.371, 0.957), p<0.05). Conversely, hypermetropia (OR=8.882, 95% CI (0.389×10 -3, 2.06×105), p>0.05) and astigmatism (OR=1.004, 95% CI (0.888, 1.135), p>0.05) do not exhibit a causal relationship with the risk of diabetic retinopathy.Conclusion This two-sample Mendelian randomization study provides evidence that myopia may impede diabetic retinopathy occurrence, while hypermetropia and astigmatism show no significant causal effects. However, our analysis treats refractive errors as independent entities, which may not reflect their clinical interdependence. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate myopia’s protective mechanisms.